Since the art of picture editing is so tricky to assess on face value, it can be equally tricky to predict how a large voting body like the Academy will assess it. The Oscar for Best Film Editing usually goes either to the Best Picture winner or probable runner-up, or occasionally something far from winning Best Picture but which obviously features the "most" editing. Over the last fifteen years, three precursor groups in particular have been informative: The BAFTA, the BFCA, and the ACE guild.
An impartial and unbiased (yeah right) examination of awards season madness
Showing posts with label film editing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film editing. Show all posts
Thursday, February 16, 2017
One Category at a Time: Best Film Editing
Labels:
Arrival,
Cross,
film editing,
Gilbert (John),
Hacksaw Ridge,
Hell or High Water,
La La Land,
McMillon,
Moonlight,
Oscar predictions,
Roberts (Jake),
Sanders (Nat),
Walker (Joe)
Thursday, February 9, 2017
My Award Nominations: Editing
All five of these movies that I've chalked up as having the Best Editing of the year all have one thing in common: Excellent pacing. And yet I'm fascinated at how incredibly diverse their tempos are, some finding rhythm in languid relaxation, others in frenetic montage. Check them out below.
Labels:
20th Century Women,
Arrival,
Cross,
film editing,
Hell or High Water,
Jones (Leslie),
La La Land,
McMillon,
Moonlight,
My Awards,
Roberts (Jake),
Sanders (Nat),
Walker (Joe)
Saturday, January 28, 2017
ACE Eddie Winners, and PGA/SAG Preview
To the surprise of precisely no one, La La Land won the ACE Eddie Award last night for Best Edited Feature Film (Comedy). Tom Cross is likely en route to his second Oscar in three years.
The Dramatic Feature category was a bit more competitive, but prevailing pundit logic of Joe Walker's editorial of Arrival winning out proved to be correct. Can't argue with either of these winners. For me, they're easily the top two editing achievements of the year, with everything else eating their dust.
The Dramatic Feature category was a bit more competitive, but prevailing pundit logic of Joe Walker's editorial of Arrival winning out proved to be correct. Can't argue with either of these winners. For me, they're easily the top two editing achievements of the year, with everything else eating their dust.
Labels:
animated feature,
Arrival,
Cross,
documentary,
film editing,
La La Land,
O.J. Made in America,
PGA,
predictions,
SAG,
Walker (Joe),
Zootopia
Tuesday, January 3, 2017
ACE Eddie nominations
It's going to be a busy two weeks of guild nominations and precursors, starting today with the American Cinema Editors (discussed after the cut), and continuing all the way to next Thursday (the 12th) with the Directors Guild. Polls for Oscar nominations, by the way, will close the very next day.
Critics groups have made it clear that the two horses they'd back are Moonlight and La La Land, which (by no coincidence) are also the only two yours truly would consider voting for as Best Picture of 2016. That's the thing about weak years: It makes it real easy for consensus to form around the few truly great movies that materialize.
Both seem likely to win the respective categories where they were nominated by the editors' guild, but let's take a quick survey of the other contenders...
Critics groups have made it clear that the two horses they'd back are Moonlight and La La Land, which (by no coincidence) are also the only two yours truly would consider voting for as Best Picture of 2016. That's the thing about weak years: It makes it real easy for consensus to form around the few truly great movies that materialize.
Both seem likely to win the respective categories where they were nominated by the editors' guild, but let's take a quick survey of the other contenders...
Labels:
ACE,
animated feature,
documentary,
film editing,
O.J. Made in America
Saturday, February 13, 2016
My Award Nominations: Editing
My roster of personal nominees continues growing this weekend with the visual post-production categories and music.
It's one of those years when I wish I could include about seven or eight nominees for Best Editing. It pained me to make some of these cuts (heehee), but I like the final five I've wound up with:
It's one of those years when I wish I could include about seven or eight nominees for Best Editing. It pained me to make some of these cuts (heehee), but I like the final five I've wound up with:
Labels:
Amy (doc),
film editing,
Hamilton (Eddie),
Inside Out,
King (Chris),
Mad Max,
Mission Impossible,
My Awards,
Nolting,
Scalia,
Sixel,
The Martian
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
One Category at a Time: Editing
It used to be you could always count in the ACE winner to guide your prediction for Best Film Editing, but in the four years since The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo stunned on Oscar night, this has become the hardest craft category to gauge. Sometimes they go with the Best Picture winner, sometimes the presumed Best Picture runner-up, sometimes something whose editing is just more conspicuous.
Labels:
Corwin,
film editing,
Mad Max,
Markey & Brandon,
McArdle,
Mirrione,
Oscar predictions,
Sixel,
Spotlight,
Star Wars,
The Big Short,
The Revenant
Sunday, January 31, 2016
ACE winners and SAG Predix [UPDATE: Winners]
It's a busy weekend of guild activity. The American Cinema Editors handed out hardware last night to all the usual suspects: Amy and Inside Out received their due in the ghettoized doc and animation categories (but seriously, the editing in those two are good enough to be up for the Oscar), while the current fruntrunners for the Academy's editing prize, The Big Short and Mad Max: Fury Road, got to split the top honours due to comedy/drama distinctions. I'm leaning the way of The Big Short coming out on top in the end, but a BAFTA win for Mad Max may yet give me hope.
Both of those are also in the hunt for awards from the Screen Actors Guild tonight. Mad Max is sure to take the prize for Best Stunt Ensemble, but The Big Short has its eyes set on the more significant Best Ensemble category. If Spotlight is going to make a push back in the latter half of phase two, it must start here. If it loses, however, then it truly is a runaway train.
Three of the four individual acting categories feel locked into place, but for Best Supporting Actor due to the absence of presumed frontrunner Sylvester Stallone. If Mark Rylance or Christian Bale (the only SAG contenders nominated for the Oscar) win, then I think this is still a race to the finish.
My guesses:
Best Stunt Ensemble: Mad Max [WINNER: Mad Max] Because d'uh.
Best Supporting Actor: Christian Bale [WINNER: Idris Elba] So this ends up not affecting the Oscar race for the moment. Only the forthcoming BAFTA ceremony can shed any light on who Sly's greatest challenger really is.
Best Supporting Actress: Alicia Vikander [WINNER: Alicia Vikander] Category fraud lives.
Best Leading Actor: Leonardo DiCaprio [WINNER: Leonardo DiCaprio] Cannot be stopped.
Best Leading Actress: Brie Larson [WINNER: Brie Larson] But will the Brits prefer her to Irish darling Saoirse Ronan?
Best Ensemble: The Big Short [WINNER: Spotlight] Thank God! This is enough to at least keep the Best Picture race interesting for another week. And even if this proves to be the only major prize that Spotlight claims over The Big Short, it's certainly the most satisfying and deserved prize to win.
Both of those are also in the hunt for awards from the Screen Actors Guild tonight. Mad Max is sure to take the prize for Best Stunt Ensemble, but The Big Short has its eyes set on the more significant Best Ensemble category. If Spotlight is going to make a push back in the latter half of phase two, it must start here. If it loses, however, then it truly is a runaway train.
Three of the four individual acting categories feel locked into place, but for Best Supporting Actor due to the absence of presumed frontrunner Sylvester Stallone. If Mark Rylance or Christian Bale (the only SAG contenders nominated for the Oscar) win, then I think this is still a race to the finish.
My guesses:
Best Stunt Ensemble: Mad Max [WINNER: Mad Max] Because d'uh.
Best Supporting Actor: Christian Bale [WINNER: Idris Elba] So this ends up not affecting the Oscar race for the moment. Only the forthcoming BAFTA ceremony can shed any light on who Sly's greatest challenger really is.
Best Supporting Actress: Alicia Vikander [WINNER: Alicia Vikander] Category fraud lives.
Best Leading Actor: Leonardo DiCaprio [WINNER: Leonardo DiCaprio] Cannot be stopped.
Best Leading Actress: Brie Larson [WINNER: Brie Larson] But will the Brits prefer her to Irish darling Saoirse Ronan?
Best Ensemble: The Big Short [WINNER: Spotlight] Thank God! This is enough to at least keep the Best Picture race interesting for another week. And even if this proves to be the only major prize that Spotlight claims over The Big Short, it's certainly the most satisfying and deserved prize to win.
Labels:
ACE,
Amy (doc),
film editing,
Inside Out,
Mad Max,
predictions,
SAG,
The Big Short
Thursday, August 6, 2015
Review - Mission: Impossible -- Rogue Nation
In an
age when cinephiles continue to bemoan the glut (and the fiscal
success) of unoriginal populist entertainment, I feel it's important
to remember not all unoriginal populist entertainment is created
equal. There's that which is dumb, lazy or poorly made, and there's
that which is so well executed it truly entertains despite its
familiarity. Mission:
Impossible – Rogue Nation,
the fifth in the series of Tom Cruise vehicles which had plateaued at
'mediocre' until Brad Bird's 2011 entry Ghost
Protocol, falls
comfortably into the latter designation.
Thankfully,
you don't need to have followed the previous globe-trotting exploits
of super spy Ethan Hunt (Cruise, barely aged since his first M:I outing in 1996) and his Impossible Mission Force, IMF, to enjoy
Rogue Nation.
You don't even need to follow this one all that closely. In a
franchise whose primary draw is its star and his daring-do, story
details erase themselves from one's memory as readily as the famously
self-destructing messages that send Ethan on his next mission, should
he choose to accept it. Which he does, of course.
Labels:
2015 Review,
Baldwin,
cinematography,
Cruise,
Elswit,
Ferguson (Rebecca),
film editing,
Hamilton (Eddie),
Harris (Sean),
McQuarrie,
Mission Impossible,
Pegg,
Renner (Jeremy),
Rhames
Friday, May 22, 2015
Review - Mad Max: Fury Road
It's a mad, mad, mad, mad world. Max is
just living in it. Well, existing in it.
By his own admission, survival is the one instinct that he – the last sane man in a world gone crazy – has been reduced to as he wanders through the post-
apocalyptic Wasteland in Mad Max: Fury Road, the fourth in a film series that hasn't revved its engines since 1985.
By his own admission, survival is the one instinct that he – the last sane man in a world gone crazy – has been reduced to as he wanders through the post-
apocalyptic Wasteland in Mad Max: Fury Road, the fourth in a film series that hasn't revved its engines since 1985.
The real madman is
producer-writer-director George Miller. Mad for deciding to pull his
long dormant road warrior out of retirement 30 years beyond
Thunderdome; Mad for conceiving the sort of world that
heretofore could only have existed in a truck-driving anarchist's
worst acid trips; And finally, mad for pulling it off with the sheer
mind-shredding gusto that filmmakers half his age (he recently turned
70) consistently struggle to inject into modern action movies.
Labels:
2015 Review,
cinematography,
film editing,
Hardy,
Hoult,
Keays-Byrne,
Mad Max,
Miller (George),
Seale,
Sixel,
Theron
Friday, April 10, 2015
Early Oscar Predictions: Visual Post-Production
Once principle photography has wrapped,
the long, laborious post-production process begins. Editors splice
together all the footage while visual effects artists and animators
complete the effects shots.
The editing branch has a habit for
mostly cribbing from the Best Picture lineup for their own nominees.
That doesn't give us much to go on from a predictive standpoint, but
there are a few early contenders that wouldn't be terrible bets.
Labels:
Bridge of Spies,
film editing,
In the Heart of the Sea,
Joy,
Jurassic World,
Oscar predictions,
Star Wars,
Steve Jobs,
The Avengers,
The Martian,
The Revenant,
The Walk,
visual effects
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
What to do about film editing and sound mixing?
I've already written my pieces about Best Film Editing and Best Sound Mixing, but it bears repeating:
These categories are really freakin' tough to predict. More so this year than usual.
Whiplash has the type of editing style that frequently wins Oscars, but have enough voters actually seen the scrappy Sundance alumnus that barely passed $10M at the box office? How many Academy members are buying the "12 years of footage" byline in Boyhood? American Sniper is certainly the wild card in the category and I may stick with it as my final prediction (hey, you need to allow yourself at least a few against-the-grain guesses), but it'll be a game time decision.
Best Sound Mixing is an equally frustrating three-way race. The driving musical rhythms of Whiplash certainly stand out, but it's a question of how many voters have seen it? Don't let J.K. Simmons' domination of Best Supporting Actor fool you; There are a ton of people who will vote for him without having seen his performance (dude's beloved). And will the sound really jump out at people on screener? Birdman has brilliant sound work that excels by not drawing attention to itself, but neither did the likes of Hugo or Slumdog Millionaire. And American Sniper looks strong in sound editing, so how does it makes sense not to predict it here, given how rare splits are?
All of this is simply to say: Don't be surprised if my prediction sidebar toggles back and forth on these categories over the next few days. I'm also having similar debates about Best Foreign Language Film, which I'll address tomorrow.
[UPDATE:] I'm also reneging on a couple of my initial thoughts in the shorts. All will be finalized by Sunday morning at the latest.
These categories are really freakin' tough to predict. More so this year than usual.
Whiplash has the type of editing style that frequently wins Oscars, but have enough voters actually seen the scrappy Sundance alumnus that barely passed $10M at the box office? How many Academy members are buying the "12 years of footage" byline in Boyhood? American Sniper is certainly the wild card in the category and I may stick with it as my final prediction (hey, you need to allow yourself at least a few against-the-grain guesses), but it'll be a game time decision.
Best Sound Mixing is an equally frustrating three-way race. The driving musical rhythms of Whiplash certainly stand out, but it's a question of how many voters have seen it? Don't let J.K. Simmons' domination of Best Supporting Actor fool you; There are a ton of people who will vote for him without having seen his performance (dude's beloved). And will the sound really jump out at people on screener? Birdman has brilliant sound work that excels by not drawing attention to itself, but neither did the likes of Hugo or Slumdog Millionaire. And American Sniper looks strong in sound editing, so how does it makes sense not to predict it here, given how rare splits are?
All of this is simply to say: Don't be surprised if my prediction sidebar toggles back and forth on these categories over the next few days. I'm also having similar debates about Best Foreign Language Film, which I'll address tomorrow.
[UPDATE:] I'm also reneging on a couple of my initial thoughts in the shorts. All will be finalized by Sunday morning at the latest.
Labels:
American Sniper,
Birdman,
Boyhood,
film editing,
foreign language film,
Oscar predictions,
sound mixing,
Whiplash
One Category at a Time: Film Editing
Well... I got nothin'.
I've been very hit-and-miss in this category as of late, failing to guess the retrospectively obvious win for Gravity last year and the forever unobvious win for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo two years before that. But I ain't never seen a Best Film Editing race as confusing as this year's, in which the Best Picture favourite isn't even in the running, and almost every nominee feels like a possible – heck, even a likely – winner.
I've been very hit-and-miss in this category as of late, failing to guess the retrospectively obvious win for Gravity last year and the forever unobvious win for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo two years before that. But I ain't never seen a Best Film Editing race as confusing as this year's, in which the Best Picture favourite isn't even in the running, and almost every nominee feels like a possible – heck, even a likely – winner.
Labels:
Adair,
American Sniper,
Boyhood,
Cox & Roach,
Cross,
film editing,
Goldenberg,
Oscar predictions,
Pilling,
The Grand Budapest Hotel,
The Imitation Game,
Whiplash
Friday, February 13, 2015
My Award Nominations: Best Film Editing
Today I've got a couple of post-production elements to add to my growing awards ballot. Starting things off is Best Film Editing. The temptation was great, but I resisted the urge to merely load this category with Best Picture nominees (this ain't the Oscars!), and tried to branch out where I could. The following five films are not only extremely well edited, but they also display a very wide cross-section of editing styles. Variety is the spice of film awards!
Check 'em out after the jump.
Check 'em out after the jump.
Labels:
Adair,
Baker (Zene),
Boyhood,
Cross,
Edge of Tomorrow,
film editing,
Herbert,
My Awards,
Neighbours,
Pensa,
Vallee,
Whiplash,
Wild
Sunday, February 8, 2015
BAFTA Clarifies Some Races, Obscures Others
So the EE British Academy of Film and Television Awards just wrapped up not long ago, but you won't get to watch the ceremony until later tonight because for all their fine cinematic tastes, the organization still hasn't evolved past their daft custom of broadcasting the show after all the winners are all public knowledge. Get with the times, BAFTA!
Anyway, I'm not really interested in the program so much as the results. Boyhood shrugged off last night's possibly crippling DGA loss to keep its Oscar hopes afloat. Also winning for the film were Patty Arquette (lock) and director Richard Linklater (not so much a lock).
Other big winners include The Grand Budapest Hotel with five, and The Theory of Everything and Whiplash with three. Oscar frontrunner Birdman took home only a single honour for Emmanuel Lubezki's virtuoso cinematography.
But what I was hoping this last major precursor of the season could really do is help illuminate some of the Academy's more unpredictable races. The British Academy is, after all, similar in membership size to AMPAS, and can therefore offer some clues on what sort of films will appeal to a large group in certain categories.
Labels:
BAFTA,
Birdman,
Boyhood,
Desplat,
film editing,
Johannsson (Johann),
makeup,
original score,
original screenplay,
sound mixing,
The Grand Budapest Hotel,
The Theory of Everything,
Whiplash
Friday, February 6, 2015
Will DGA-BAFTA Weekend Clafiry Some Tight Races?
Final Oscar balloting started today, right on the cusp of a weekend that will unveil the winners of the Directors Guild of America and the British Academy of Film and Television. A number of the Oscar categories still feel maddeningly close a full three weeks after they were announced, so the pending results of this weekend's kudos could be the litmus test we need.
Or they could just be a bunch of red herrings.
Take the Best Actor race, for instance:
Or they could just be a bunch of red herrings.
Take the Best Actor race, for instance:
Labels:
actor,
BAFTA,
Boyhood,
Cooper (Bradley),
DGA,
film editing,
Inarritu,
Keaton (Michael),
Linklater,
predictions,
Redmayne
Saturday, January 31, 2015
'Boyhood', 'Grand Budapest' Win with Editors Guild
The American Cinema Editors handed out their hardware last night, honouring Boyhood's Sandra Adair in the drama category and The Grand Budapest Hotel's Barney Pilling in the muscial/comedy category. Both were nominated by the Academy.
I gotta say this Oscar category is still a complete mystery to me. It used to be that the winner of the ACE drama award always went on to win the Oscar, but that pattern has been bucked twice in the last three years. True, Boyhood could pull out the win on account of its "12 years of footage" narrative (a bit of an oversimplification, as it's actually only 12 weeks of footage amassed over 12 years), but the Academy usually goes for editing that... stands out. The greatest thing about Boyhood's montage is how invisibly fluent it is. I could definitely see something with a more rigourous cutting style like Whiplash or American Sniper taking it.
Elsewhere, The LEGO Movie won the animated category, adding more salt to the wound of its Oscar snub, while Citizenfour won the doc category for Mathilde Bonnefoy (who will actually get to take home her own Oscar since she's also a producer on the film).
I gotta say this Oscar category is still a complete mystery to me. It used to be that the winner of the ACE drama award always went on to win the Oscar, but that pattern has been bucked twice in the last three years. True, Boyhood could pull out the win on account of its "12 years of footage" narrative (a bit of an oversimplification, as it's actually only 12 weeks of footage amassed over 12 years), but the Academy usually goes for editing that... stands out. The greatest thing about Boyhood's montage is how invisibly fluent it is. I could definitely see something with a more rigourous cutting style like Whiplash or American Sniper taking it.
Elsewhere, The LEGO Movie won the animated category, adding more salt to the wound of its Oscar snub, while Citizenfour won the doc category for Mathilde Bonnefoy (who will actually get to take home her own Oscar since she's also a producer on the film).
Labels:
ACE,
Adair,
animated feature,
Bonnefoy,
Boyhood,
Citizenfour,
documentary,
film editing,
Pilling,
The Grand Budapest Hotel,
The LEGO Movie
Monday, January 19, 2015
Review - American Sniper
Pulling a trigger may be the single
most dehumanizing act there is. Every time one person makes the
conscious decision to end the life of another, they lose a part of
themselves that cannot be retrieved. Most people would grow ill at
the thought of performing this act even once. What kind of person
would it take to have done it 160 times? How would he/she feel?
In Clint Eastwood's American Sniper,
we're introduced to the real-life figure that epitomizes the moral
quandary at the root of killing for one's country; NAVY Seal Chris
Kyle, who became the deadliest shot in U.S. military history over the
course of four tours in Iraq, earning him the nickname 'Legend'. But
an introduction is not the same as an examination, and as riveting an
introduction it is at times, it does not delve deep enough into the
man behind the 'legend'.
Labels:
2014 Review,
American Sniper,
Cooper (Bradley),
Cox & Roach,
Eastwood,
film editing,
Hall (Jason),
Miller (Sienna)
Friday, January 2, 2015
ACE Eddie nominees yield a couple of surprises
Next week promises to be a crazy busy one for awards watchers with no less than six guilds announcing their nominees. But getting a jump on all of them are the American Cinema Editors, who offered up their opinion of the best edited films of the year this morning.
Most of the biggest players in the Best Picture race found some love from the editors, except for Selma which might be suffering the effects of a super late release.
Check out all the nominees with some additional comments after the cut.
Most of the biggest players in the Best Picture race found some love from the editors, except for Selma which might be suffering the effects of a super late release.
But the more interesting than any snubs are the entrants that weren't entirely expected: Nightcrawler and American Sniper both turned up in the Drama category -- which has six nominees due to a tie -- and that can only be a good omen for these Best Picture dark horses during this crucial voting period (ballots went out on Monday and are due next Thursday).
Check out all the nominees with some additional comments after the cut.
Labels:
ACE,
American Sniper,
film editing,
Nightcrawler,
Selma
Sunday, December 7, 2014
'Boyhood' dominates busy day of critical kudos
There were three critics groups announcing their awards today (props to all those folks who sat at there computer for 12 hours watching the drip feed of winners on Twitter): Boston Society of Film Critics, New York Film Critics Online, and the LA Film Critics Association. All three of them echoed the New York Film Critics Circle's decision to name Richard Linklater's Boyhood the best film of 2014.
Linklater himself also took all three Best Director prizes, but wasn't even in a timezone where he could hear all the good news! Instead he was overseas at the British Independent Film Awards, where his critical darling won Best International Film. Talk about an eventful day!
Beyond those top two categories, the only other race which saw a unanimous winner from all three organizations was Best Documentary, which predictably went to Citizenfour. I've only seen a couple of docs this year (the other being the enjoyable if unremarkable Life Itself), so I'll have to catch up with a lot of the other contenders before deciding if all this praise for this one is justified.
After the jump I'll list the winners and runner-ups of the LAFCA with some thoughts:
Linklater himself also took all three Best Director prizes, but wasn't even in a timezone where he could hear all the good news! Instead he was overseas at the British Independent Film Awards, where his critical darling won Best International Film. Talk about an eventful day!
Beyond those top two categories, the only other race which saw a unanimous winner from all three organizations was Best Documentary, which predictably went to Citizenfour. I've only seen a couple of docs this year (the other being the enjoyable if unremarkable Life Itself), so I'll have to catch up with a lot of the other contenders before deciding if all this praise for this one is justified.
After the jump I'll list the winners and runner-ups of the LAFCA with some thoughts:
Labels:
Boyhood,
Citizenfour,
documentary,
film editing,
LAFCA,
Linklater,
supporting actor
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Review - Force Majeure
If you and your family were faced with
a life-threatening situation, how would you react? Would you put
yourself in harm's way to protect your loved ones, or would your
self-preservation reflexes compel you to flee?
Obviously, the more valorous answer is
the one you would give to anyone who asks, but the truth is we never
really know which instinct will rule our actions until we're actually
faced with a real force majeure. That legalese term for an
extraordinary or dangerous circumstance is also the title of Swedish
provocateur Ruben Östlund's
new dramedy, which probes this hypothetical for some revelations as
slippery as a double black diamond ski run.
Östlund
sets the scene at a luxury resort in the French Alps, where we meet a
seemingly idyllic family: Tomas, Ebba, and their kids Harry &
Vera. And yet Östlund
suggests that they're not nearly as solid as they let on.
Labels:
2014 Review,
cinematography,
film editing,
Force Majeure,
foreign language film,
Kongsli,
Kuhnke,
Ostlund,
Wenzel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















