I can be a tough critic to please sometimes, but I get especially grinchy during the holiday crunch when awards season group-think forces me to seek out prestige-courting biopics and true-to-life narratives for which I'd gladly have waited. In the ten days since I first set eyes upon Todd Hayne's exquisite Carol, I've struck out thrice with other Globe/BFCA heavies Trumbo, The Danish Girl, and The Big Short; All of them capitalizing on year-end kudos, whether or not they should.
Trumbo is especially unfortunate. True Hollywood stories are of inherent interest to me (and many a cinephile, I should imagine), so it really says something when I despair at how unengaged I was by Jay Roach's shapeless biopic of the legendary screenwriter, who was infamously blackballed by McCarthy-era witch hunt politics. The man himself (likely Oscar nominee Bryan Cranston) would have shuddered at the
screenplay's lack of structure and payoff. The film's strong SAG haul, particularly the Best Ensemble nomination, is baffling. Sure, there are a handful of droll impersonations in there -- David James Elliott's John Wayne and Dean O'Gorman's Kirk Douglas are aces -- but everyone is play acting instead of screen acting. Yes,
there is a difference. The lone exceptions are Elle Fanning and Diane Lane as the key female figures in Trumbo's life, his daughter Niki and his wife Cleo.
An impartial and unbiased (yeah right) examination of awards season madness
Showing posts with label Giamatti. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Giamatti. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Last quarter 'true story' Oscar bait underwhelms
Labels:
2015 Review,
Banks,
Cranston,
Cusack,
Dano,
Giamatti,
Hooper,
Love & Mercy,
McKay,
Pohlad,
Redmayne,
Roach (Jay),
The Big Short,
The Danish Girl,
Trumbo,
Vikander
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Review - 12 Years a Slave
Two men labor on sweltering a Louisiana
afternoon, planing wood and hammering nails into an small unfinished
building. To their own eyes, they are equal; sharing conversation and
stories of their lives. But equal they are not; one a free white man
working for wage, the other a black man in bondage, working simply
because it is what he was sold to do. “Your story is amazing,”
the free man says to the slave. “And in no good way.” That really
is the most essential way to describe the incredible true story of
Solomon Northrup, who was kidnapped from his home and family to be
sold into slavery. Based on Northrup's 1853 memoir, Steve McQueen's
12 Years a Slave stares unblinking into arguably the darkest
chapter of the United States' history, making a case for itself as
the definitive American horror story.
In 1814, still 59 years before the
Emancipation Proclamation, Solomon Northrup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) lives
as an upstanding citizen in Saratoga, NY – an atypically
progressive community for its time. A gifted violinist by trade and a
decent man by nature, he is free and proud to walk the streets with
his family, wearing his finest clothes, frequenting the finest shops,
sheltered from common bigotry by his respected status. But this dream
existence proves to be just that: a dream – one from which he
awakens in shackles, alone and confused in a cold, dark cell. Daring
to insist to his captors that he is free man and justice shall be
done, he is flogged, menaced, and stripped of his identity along with
his bloodied shirt. He is Solomon Northrup no more. He is a “Georgia
runaway” by the name of Platt, or so he must pretend if he wishes
to survive his waking nightmare.
Labels:
12 Years a Slave,
2013 Review,
actor,
Bobbit,
Collins (Ryan),
Cumberbatch,
Ejiofor,
Fassbender,
Giamatti,
McQueen,
Norris,
Nyong'o,
Paulson,
Ridley (John),
Shatz,
sound mixing,
Stockhausen,
Walker (Joe)
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Sunday Top Ten - Snubs of the decade
As we enter the new Oscar season I find myself wondering what the big snub of the year is going to be. There's invariably at least one big snub every year, though not necessarily in a “big” category. This past year it was the perplexing exclusion of Inception from Best Film Editing. While I continue to ponder which deserving contender will fall victim to the Academy's questionable taste, here's a look back at ten egregious snubs from the decade that was (2000-2009).
Note: I tried to limit myself to awards hopefuls that actually stood a chance at being nominated. For instance, I felt that The Cove was the Best Picture of 2009, but never entertained the delusion that it could be nominated. The real sting of a missed nomination comes from expecting it to actually happen. That being said...
Note: I tried to limit myself to awards hopefuls that actually stood a chance at being nominated. For instance, I felt that The Cove was the Best Picture of 2009, but never entertained the delusion that it could be nominated. The real sting of a missed nomination comes from expecting it to actually happen. That being said...
Labels:
4 months 3 Weeks 2 Days,
Almost Famous,
Batman,
Black Hawk Down,
City of God,
District 9,
Giamatti,
Serkis,
snubs,
The Wrestler,
There Will Be Blood,
Top Ten,
WALL-E
Monday, April 4, 2011
One Category at a Time: Best Supporting Actor
As it was with Supporting Actress, I managed to guess three of this past year's nominees from a year out. I was relatively confident about some of those early picks too, but I can't say the same thing about any of today's advanced predictions.
It's odd to think that Paul Giamatti only has one nomination to his name (and for Cinderella Man of all things), but the Academy will have a chance to remedy that if he delivers in George Clooney's A-lister-filled drama The Ides of March. But will internal competition keep him from attracting enough attention? There are lots of possible Supporting Actor candidates in the film.
This category is often kind to respected veterans whose best work is behind them, but whose longevity and versatility allows them to continue working. After garnering his first career nomination last year, Christopher Plummer could return for another shot with Mike Mills' Beginners.
Meryl Streep has the tendency to steal her costars' spotlight, but recall Stanley Tucci's warm turn as her supportive turn in Julie & Julia probably helped him earn his nomination last year (although for a different movie). Maybe Jim Broadbent can win some awards love by playing her supportive husband in The Iron Lady?
For a few years Philip Seymour Hoffman was ubiquitous, first winning his Oscars for Capote and then following it up with two consecutive Supporting Actor nods. He's been absent a couple of years now, but Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zaillian have probably written him a plum role in Moneyball. The film is being made by Bennett Miller who directed Hoffman to that Capote Oscar.
And for a really off the wall prediction, how about Kenneth Branagh in My Week with Marilyn? I always forget that he has four nominations (in four different categories!), although the last one was in 1996 for adapting Hamlet. Perhaps there's a chance he can nab a nod for playing Laurence Olivier.
Predicted five:
Christopher Plummer in Beginners
Paul Giamatti in The Ides of March
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Moneyball or The Ides of March
Jim Broadbent in The Iron Lady
Kenneth Branagh in My Week with Marilyn
Also consider: Vincent Cassal in A Dangerous Method, Daniel Craig in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Thomas Hayden Church in We Bought a Zoo, Hal Holbrook in Water for Elephants, Sean Penn in The Tree of Life, Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life, John C. Reilly in We Need to Talk About Kevin, Christoph Waltz in Water for Elephants
It's odd to think that Paul Giamatti only has one nomination to his name (and for Cinderella Man of all things), but the Academy will have a chance to remedy that if he delivers in George Clooney's A-lister-filled drama The Ides of March. But will internal competition keep him from attracting enough attention? There are lots of possible Supporting Actor candidates in the film.
This category is often kind to respected veterans whose best work is behind them, but whose longevity and versatility allows them to continue working. After garnering his first career nomination last year, Christopher Plummer could return for another shot with Mike Mills' Beginners.
Meryl Streep has the tendency to steal her costars' spotlight, but recall Stanley Tucci's warm turn as her supportive turn in Julie & Julia probably helped him earn his nomination last year (although for a different movie). Maybe Jim Broadbent can win some awards love by playing her supportive husband in The Iron Lady?
For a few years Philip Seymour Hoffman was ubiquitous, first winning his Oscars for Capote and then following it up with two consecutive Supporting Actor nods. He's been absent a couple of years now, but Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zaillian have probably written him a plum role in Moneyball. The film is being made by Bennett Miller who directed Hoffman to that Capote Oscar.
And for a really off the wall prediction, how about Kenneth Branagh in My Week with Marilyn? I always forget that he has four nominations (in four different categories!), although the last one was in 1996 for adapting Hamlet. Perhaps there's a chance he can nab a nod for playing Laurence Olivier.
Predicted five:
Christopher Plummer in Beginners
Paul Giamatti in The Ides of March
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Moneyball or The Ides of March
Jim Broadbent in The Iron Lady
Kenneth Branagh in My Week with Marilyn
Also consider: Vincent Cassal in A Dangerous Method, Daniel Craig in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Thomas Hayden Church in We Bought a Zoo, Hal Holbrook in Water for Elephants, Sean Penn in The Tree of Life, Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life, John C. Reilly in We Need to Talk About Kevin, Christoph Waltz in Water for Elephants
Labels:
Beginners,
Branagh,
Broadbent,
Giamatti,
Hoffman (PS),
Moneyball,
My Week with Marilyn,
Oscar predictions,
Plummer,
supporting actor,
The Ides of March,
The Iron Lady
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



