"Cosmology," responds PhD
candidate Stephen Hawking when asked about religion at a Cambridge
mixer in 1963. "It's religion for scientific atheists."
This answer may seem like an odd way to
pick up girls (especially proper Christian ones), but it strikes a
chord for the young woman who's asking him – and who just so
happens to be his future wife, Jane. Perhaps she too sees the beauty
in his pursuit of a single universal equation that can explain all
the mysteries of time and space; A 'theory of everything'.
Redmayne in particular delivers a remarkably controlled physical performance that articulates the degeneration of Stephen Hawking's condition in calibrated detail. At first his affliction manifests itself as miniscule twitches: He spills a cup of coffee, his writing becomes increasingly illegible, and his hands ever-so-slightly contort in abnormal positions.
The early warnings go unnoticed by
Stephen and Jane, but we know what's happening to him. Marsh
accordingly milks these moments for as much dramatic irony as he can,
knowing well that Stephen's sudden diagnosis will come as a shock to
him, but not to us.
When the doctor breaks the news that he
has motor neuron disease – related to ALS of recent 'ice bucket
challenge' fame – and gives him two years to live, Stephen and Jane
get to living as much of life as they can in what little time they've
got.
Time is so much on Stephen's mind that it becomes the topic of his PhD thesis, which postulates an exploded black hole as the beginning of time. The film ultimately sidesteps the fascinating science that became his life's work, which is something of a shame but also a necessary evil. This is, after all, as much Jane's story as it is Stephen's, adapted by Anthony McCarten from her memoir Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen.
Time is so much on Stephen's mind that it becomes the topic of his PhD thesis, which postulates an exploded black hole as the beginning of time. The film ultimately sidesteps the fascinating science that became his life's work, which is something of a shame but also a necessary evil. This is, after all, as much Jane's story as it is Stephen's, adapted by Anthony McCarten from her memoir Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen.
McCarten's screenplay is a bit of mixed
bag. On the one hand, it's a highly sanitized account of Jane and
Stephen's 25-year marriage, with what little conflict there is being
mostly understated. Even as the Hawkings eventually fall for other
people – she for a friend who assists in Stephen's care (Charlie
Cox), and he for his nurse (Maxine Peake) – the film still treats
them with almost saint-like empathy.
Yet there's an elegant simplicity to
the script's forthright discussion of love and how it can change over
time. In fact, it could have been a story about two entirely
fictional characters falling in and out of love and would not have
lost much effect, apart from Redmayne's uncanny transformation.
To compliment, rather than overshadow
their emotional evolutions, Jones and Redmayne are aged across the
decades with extreme subtlety. Steven Noble's specifically coloured
costumes and Jan Sewell's ultrafine makeup are very effective at
this, but invisibly so, meaning they may be overlooked for the awards
consideration they deserve.
A more conspicuous behind-the-scenes
contribution comes from of composer Jóhann
Jóhannsson, whose
delicate strings-over-piano score may be a tad too pronounced in the
final sound mix, but is lovely to listen to nonetheless.
But what resonates the strongest – if
you can get past its prestige Oscar-bait trappings – is what The
Theory of Everything has to say about love, without being so
corny as to come right out and actually say it. Love is messy and
complicated, and like the theoretical 'equation for everything' can
never be completely understood. But it's the pursuit of it that gives
life its purpose. That may not explain all there is to know about the
universe, but it explains an awful lot about human beings.
*** out of ****